Important Points That Public-private Partnership Firms Can Address
Unclear
responsibilities
When
there is no clarity about project governance and decision making,
there is a hindrance of effective project delivery. A public-private
partnership can help in addressing this challenge by negotiating the
performance standards, requiring the owner to document and so on.
Poor
alignment with strategy
Implementation
can be delayed or support can wane when projects aren’t backed by a
robust and strategic commitment. The public-private partnership is
thoroughly vetted and screened with a high degree of public
visibility from a portfolio of potential investments. This results in
project commitments that are aligned with the sponsor’s strategy.
The
insufficient project features optimization
Public
finance management consulting
firms can encourage innovative ways of problem-solving in case
sponsors are constrained by the current methodologies and standards.
Lack
of an ownership mindset
With
traditional project delivery, there are high chances of poor
alignment between the owner and the contractor. In a public-private
partnership, concessionaires adapt the perspective of sponsors,
owners or both because of the obligation and performance incentives
to transfer assets in a good repair state.
No
discipline in execution
Projects
that involve large infrastructure suffer from competing objectives,
resource commitments and time frames. Public-private partnerships
achieve clarity of operational accountability and delivery by
aligning and defining contractual obligations.
Poor
project controls
Public-privatepartnership consulting firms
can help in deploying systems that are project-wide and considerable
resources to mitigate and manage deviations from plans. This results
in faster response to changes and better contingency planning. It
mitigates completing versions of progress and wasted efforts on
reconciliation.
Comments
Post a Comment